Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Heard Sri Lalit Kishore Tiwari, Advocate, holding brief of Sri A.M. Tripathi, learned counsel for petitioner, learned State counsel and perused the record.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned orders dated 3.6.2011 and 3.3.2010 (Annexures 1 and 2) passed by O.P.Nos. 2 and 3 which the petitioner’s appeal/representation has been dismissed and removed from service respectively.

3. Facts in brief of the present case as submitted by learned counsel for petitioner are that the petitioner who was working on the post of Collection Amin placed under suspension by order dated 1.7.1999 and Tehsildar Bighapur has been appointed as Inquiry Officer by the competent authority/Up-Ziladhikari, Bighapur, District Unnao/O.P.No. 3. Thereafter, a charge-sheet dated 15.7.1999 has been issued to the petitioner, served on 12.8.1999 to which he submitted his reply and the Inquiry Officer submitted his inquiry report.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the Inquiry Officer has submitted the Inquiry Report without fixing date, time and place for holding a disciplinary proceeding, so the inquiry report is in contraventio