Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Heard Sri A.P. Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Vikrant Raghuvanshi, learned State counsel and perused the record.

2. Petitioner who was working on the post of Stenographer and posted under Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tarabganj placed under suspension by order dated 3.12.2009 pending disciplinary proceedings.

3. A charge-sheet has been issued to the petitioner on 27.12.2009, served on him through Tehsildar, Sadar, after receiving the same he sought time by letter dated 15.2.2010 from the Inquiry Officer to submit reply to the charges leveled.

4. On 17.2.2010, he wrote a letter to the Inquiry Officer demanding certain documents, after receiving the said letter the Inquiry Officer on 23.2.2010 has given the documents as demanded by the petitioner. Again on n 5.3.2010, petitioner wrote a letter demanding certain other documents in response to which the Inquiry Officer has written letter dated 8.3.2010. But, the petitioner not participated in the inquiry proceedings, filed a Writ Petition No. 295 (SS) of 2010, disposed of by order 22.1.2010, relevant portion quoted as under :

“Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, it is pr