SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 483

IMTIYAZ MURTAZA, S.S.TIWARI
In Re: Raj Singh Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.:-

The con­tempt proceeding in the instant case has its genesis in the Reference made by Sri Om Prakash Dixit, Special Judge, Etawah vide letter dated 19.1.2007 which was duly for­warded by District Judge vide letter dated 20.1.2007 whereby reference has been made to this Court for initiation of contempt pro­ceeding against the contemnor namely Shiv Raj Singh Chauhan Advocate Civil Court Etawah.

2. According to the facts contained in ref­erence made to this Court, on 12.1.2007 at 10.35 a.m when the Court was busy record­ing the statement in a final enquiry No. 6 F/2006 State v. Rakesh Kumar Saxena, the con­temnor advocate interrupted the proceeding and insisted with the officer to send for the file and his case be got called out forthwith. When the officer asked him to wait for the proceeding to end, upon which he became furious and in terrorem, remarked which if translated into English would read that per­haps the officer was not aware as to what would happen if the request of the contemnor was not immediately attended to. It is further mentioned in the reference that again the contemnor came to the court at 11.20 a.m and perused the order sheet of Special Case No





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top