SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 1560

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, P. K. S. BAGHEL
Biresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Dhiraj Srivastava and B.K. Srivastava for the Appellant; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The appellant was appointed in a Group ‘D’ post in the Trade Tax Tribunal on 08 September 1989. The appellant was convicted by the VIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut in Session Trial No. 146 of 1986 of offences under Sections 147, 325 read with Section 149, 324 read with Section 149, and 452 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment respectively for a period of six months, two years, three years and three years. Based on the order of conviction, the services of the appellant were terminated by the Chairperson of the Trade Tax Tribunal on 11 July 1990. The appellant filed a writ petition, being Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 17805 of 1990 (Biresh Kumar v. State of U.P. and others), before the learned Single Judge questioning the legality of the termination. The writ petition has been dismissed by the impugned judgment and order dated 02 December 2011 on the ground that Article 311 (2) of the Constitution provides that without any enquiry, an order of punishment can be passed if a civil servant has been convicted in a criminal case after considering his conduct which led to the conviction.

2. The submission, which has been u
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top