SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 87

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
(Full Bench)
BEFORE : DR. DHANANJAYA YESHWANT CHANDRACHUD, C.J., DILIP GUPTA AND SUNEET KUMAR, JJ.
Smt. SHEELA DEVI AND OTHERS ....Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1518 of 2014, 48378 of 2013, 53750, 56342 and 63807 of 2014, decided on 2nd February, 2015)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Brij Raj, Amit Saxena, Manu Khare and Nitin Chandra Misra for the Petitioners; C.B. Yadav, A.A.G., Shashank Shekhar Singh, A.C.S.C., H.R. Mishra, Neeraj Tripathi, R.K. Ojha, N.D. Shukla, Sanjay Upadhyaya and Syed Mohd Fazal for the Respondents.

Headnote:Constitution of India, 1950—Part IX, Articles 243(c), 243-B—U.P. Kshetra Panchayat and Zila Panchayat Act, 1961—Section 15—No confidence motion—Pramukh of a Kshettra Panchayat—Power of Collector—Scope of—Whether District Magistrate under the 1961 Act while proceeding to entertain a notice for tabling a no confidence motion under Section 15 against Block Pramukh can exercise his discretion for examining the genuineness or veracity of signatures endorsed by the members?—Held, 'No'—Collector has the discretion to determine whether the notice fulfills the essential requirements of a valid notice under Section 15(2)—Where a finding in regard to the validity of signatures can only be arrived at in an enquiry on basis of evidence adduced in the course of an evidentiary hearing at a full-fledged trial—Such an enquiry would be outside the purview of Section 15—Collector does not exercise the powers of a Court upon receipt of a notice and when he transmits the notice for consideration at a meeting of elected members of Kshettra Panchayat—Directions issued. [Paras 16 to 25]

       

ORAL JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, C.J.—Part IX of the Constitution makes provisions in regard to Panchayats. Part IX was introduced by the Constitution (Seventy-third) Amendment Act, 1992 which came into force on 24 April 1993. Article 243 (c) defines the expression “intermediate level” as a level between the village and district levels specified by the Governor of a State by public notification to be the intermediate level for the purposes of the Part. Article 243-B (1) requires the constitution in every State of Panchayats at the village, intermediate and district levels in accordance with the provisions of the Part. The present reference to Full Bench relates to the construction of the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961 (Act of 1961), more particularly Section 15 which relates to motion of no confidence against a Pramukh of a Kshettra Panchayat. A Kshettra Panchayat is an elected body at the intermediate level.

2. The reference was occasioned by a referring order of a Division Bench of this Court dated 10 January 20142 by which the following issue has been placed for consideration:

Whether the District Magistrate or the competent authority under the U.P. Kshetra Panchayat and Zila Panchayat Act, 1961 while proceeding to entertain a notice for tabling a no confidence motion under Section 15 thereof against the Block Pramukh, can exercise his discretion for examining the genuineness or veracity of the signatures endorsed by the members, and as to whether there is a direct conflict on principles in the judgments of this Court on the issue.

3. Sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) of Section 15 have a bearing on the controversy which is in issue and are extracted herein below for convenience of reference:

“15. Motion of no-confidence in Pramukh.—(1) A motion expressing want of confidence in the Pramukh of a Kshettra Panchayat may be made and proceeded with in accordance with the procedure laid down in the following sub-sections.

(2) A written notice of intention to make the motion in such form as may be prescribed, signed by at least half of the total number of elected members of the Kshettra Panchayat for the time being together with a copy of the proposed motion, shall be delivered in person, by any one of the members signing the notice, to the Collector having jurisdiction over the Kshettra Panchayat.

(3) The Collector shall thereupon :

(i) convene a meeting of the Kshettra Panchayat for the consideration of the motion at the office of the Kshettra Panchayat on a date appointed by him, which shall not be later than thirty days from the date on which the notice under sub-section (2) was delivered to him; and

(ii) give to the elected member of the Kshettra Panchayat notice of not less than fifteen days of such meeting in such manner as may be prescribed.

Explanation.—In computing the period of thirty days specified in this sub-section, the period during which a stay order, if any, issued by a Competent Court on a petition filed against the motion made under this section is in force plus such further time as may be required in the issue of fresh notices of the meeting to the members, shall be excluded.”

4. Sub-section (1) of Section 15 provides for a motion expressing a want of confidence in the Pramukh. Such a motion has to be made and proceeded with in accordance with the procedure laid down in the sub-sections which follow. The moving of a motion precedes its tabling and consideration. Consideration of the motion is a subsequent stage once a motion has been validly made and submitted. Sub-section (1) of Section 15 makes it clear that the making and the manner in which a motion can be proceeded with, must accord with the procedure which is laid down in the Section. Sub-section (2) of Section 15 makes provision for the stage up to the submission of a motion to the Collector having jurisdiction over the Kshettra Panchayat. Sub-section (2) sets down the following conditions:










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top