SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 222

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, P. K. S. BAGHEL
HARI SINGH RAJPUT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Rahul Jain for the Appellant; C.S.C. and Ram Kishor Gupta for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The appellant had instituted a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in order to challenge an order passed by the District Inspector of Schools on 9 December 2014, granting approval to his suspension under Section 16-G (7) of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition by the impugned judgment and order dated 9 February 2015.

2. In the special appeal arising out of the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge, two submissions have been urged on behalf of the appellant; (i) no reasons were recorded by the District Inspector of Schools while granting approval; and (ii) the order of approval was passed without furnishing to the appellant an opportunity of being heard.

3. The appellant was an officiating Principal at the material time, of an Intermediate College. A three member committee was constituted by the District Magistrate to enquire into the allegation in regard to the irregularities in and the mis-utilisation of the fund meant for mid-day-meals in the institution. The Committee consisted of the District Inspector of Schools, Tehsildar and the Sub-Divisional Magistrate. After the Commi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top