Back
D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, NARAYAN SHUKLA
MECON INDRAPRASTHA SAHAKARI AVAS SAMITI LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Hon’ble Dr. Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud, C.J.—
A The issue
In these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution, there is a challenge to the constitutional validity of the provisions of Section 113 (2) of the Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1965, Act which were introduced by way of an amendment by U.P. Act 13 of 2013. The state legislature has enacted a provision which stipulates that the Right to Information Act, 2005-enacted by Parliament-shall cover all cooperative societies in the state. The issue is whether the state legislature has legislative competence to enact the provision.
B Facts
2. The background in which the constitutional challenge has been addressed before the Court is that the first petitioner is a primary cooperative housing society, co-operative society registered under the provisions of the Act. The second petitioner is the Honorary Secretary of the first petitioner. The case of the petitioners is that the cooperative society carries on its business from its own resources without any financial aid or assistance from the State and the State has no contribution to its share capital.
3. The fourth respondent, Rajendra Singh Verma, is a me
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
