Hon’ble Yashwant Varma, J.—The State is in appeal assailing the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of this Court of 5 December 2014. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition preferred by the sole respondent against an order of 25 November 2014 which had turned down his claim for grant of pension and gratuity. The order of 25 November 2014 records that the respondent had worked as a muster roll employee between the period 3 June 1989 to 28 February 2011. He was subsequently absorbed in the permanent establishment on 1 March 2011 whereafter he retired on 30 June 2014. The claim for pension and other benefits came to be turned down on account of the respondent not acquiring the requisite qualifying service essential for grant of the above benefit. The learned Single Judge relying upon earlier judgments rendered by the Court came to the conclusion that the period of service spent by the respondent as a work charged employee was liable to be included in computing qualifying service and accordingly set aside the order impugned and remitted the matter to the fourth appellant for reconsideration of the claim of the respondent. The issue canvassed before us was wh