Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Heard Shri Brijesh Yadav “Vijay”, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the opposite party No. 2, Shri Azad Khan, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 3 and perused the record.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated 30.11.2015 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 2, Sultanpur by which the petitioners’ application for impleadment in Regular Suit No. 192/97 has been rejected.

3. Facts in brief of the present case are that opposite party No. 4/Daya Ram filed a suit for permanent injunction in respect of the property mentioned in paragraph 3 of the plaint, which reads as under :

Þ;g fd xkVk laŒ 15 A jdck 0-278 ;/kfi jktLo vfHkys[kksa esa catj ds [ksr esa ntZ gS exj mlesa oknh ds nj[rku vkt fdLe vke 5 egqvk 6 tkequ 7 uhe 5 ccwy 2 ckaldksB 3 cSj 2 vNh 5 duSy 10 isM+ ekStqn gSa ftles yxHkx 15 lky ls ysdj lSdM+ksa lky ds nj[rku fLFkfr gS fofnr jgs fd fookfnr nj[rku esa dqN isM+ ijikt oknh dqN vkt oknh dqN firk oknh o dqN isM+ Lo;a oknh ds yxk,a o lSFks ij j[ks gSaA bu nj[rku ds Qy o ydM+h dk bLrseky rFkk ckWldksB esa ckl dk bLrseky crkSj ekfydokn