SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 673

NARAYAN SHUKLA, SHEO KUMAR SINGH I
DHANI RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
J.P. Verma for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sheo Kumar Singh-I, J.—By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 3.10.1995 issued by the competent authority relating to making of entries in Khatauni of the land bearing Khasra No. 878/3903.55 as well as Khasra No. 189/600.83 situate at village Bharwara, Pargana, Tehsil and District Lucknow, and further issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to restore the name of the petitioner over Khasra/Khatauni and not to make any interference in his peaceful possession over the land in question.

2. Brief facts giving rise to filing of the present writ petition are that the petitioner was recorded land owner of the land mentioned above with transferable rights but without any notice or proceeding or opportunity of hearing, he has been deprived of the legitimate right of the land which has been declared by the competent authority as surplus ceiling land. By the impugned order, the land of the petitioner was declared as surplus land while it is version of the petitioner that notice under Sections 10(5) and 10(6) was not issued to him a


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top