SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 750

P.K.S.BAGHEL
DEEPENDRA KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sri Chandra for the Petitioner; C.S.C., Suresh C. Dwivedi and Ravi Prakash Pandey for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble P.K.S. Baghel, J.—The petitioner is an unsuccessful candidate for the Lekhpal Recruitment-2015. He has preferred this writ petition for a direction commanding the respondent No. 3 to provide/declare the cut-off of O.B.C. category of Lekhpal Recruitment Examination-2015 to the petitioner.

2. From the record it appears that the petitioner had moved an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information regarding his marks and some other information. In response to the said application the information officer has furnished him an information that he has got 63.2 marks in written examination and 8 marks in the interview, vide order dated 24.4.2017. He has preferred an appeal under the Right to Information Act before the State Information Commission, which is still pending. In the meantime the petitioner has instituted this writ petition for the same relief.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been furnished incomplete information as one of the informations sought by the petitioner wasin respect of the cut-off marks in District Jaunp











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top