SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
CHAND MOHD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Diwan Saifullah Khan for the Applicant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT :

Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.

1. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 380 of 2015 (Arshad Saeed Vs. Chand Mohd.), under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station Rakabganj, District Agra, pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 12, Agra as well as the order dated 29.04.2015. Further prayer has been made to stay the further proceedings of aforesaid criminal complaint case.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA appearing for the State.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits as under:

(i) Complaint Case No. 380 of 2015 (Arshad Saeed Vs. Chand Mohd.), under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, has been filed in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-12, Agra on 29.04.2015 i.e. beyond 30 days of the date of return of the complaint on 13.03.2015 by the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baadi, Dhaulpur, (Rajasthan). Thus, the complaint has been filed beyond limitation as provided by the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra (2014)







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top