SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 2874

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Mohd. Saidul Malik – Appellant
Versus
Addi. Commissioner IInd Alld . Divi. Allahabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: N.L. Srivastava
For the Respondent: C.S.C., D.D. Chauhan

JUDGMENT

Ram Surat Ram (Maurya), J.: -

Heard Sri N.L. Srivastava for the petitioner.

2. The writ petition has been filed against the order of Naib Tehsildar dated 26.4.2007 and the order of Additional Commissioner dated 31.8.2007 arising out of proceedings under Section 34 of UP Land Revenue Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

3. The dispute is related to land of plot No. 185 (area 0.1830 hectare) of village Utraw, pargana Mah, district Allahabad. The land in dispute was recorded as Talab in the revenue record. The petitioner filed an application (registered as Case No. 391 of 2007) under Section 34 of the Act for recording his name over the land in dispute. It has been stated in the application that the petitioner is running Madarsa over the land in dispute since 1921 with the permission of then Zamindar and is continuing in possession over it. The petitioner also filed a Civil Suit (registered as OS No. 788 of 1992) for permanent injunction, restraining State of UP, Gaon Sabha, Abdul Vahid and Moh. Yahiya from interfering in the possession of the petitioner over the land in dispute and filling up the tank. The suit was dismissed by trial court by the order dated 31.5.2005. Th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top