Suneet Kumar, J.

These writ petitions are based on common questions of fact and law, accordingly, on the consent of the parties are being decided together. For determination the factual matrix of the matter is being noticed from Writ C No. 40360 of 2015 (Yogesh Agarwal vs. Estate Officer and 2 others).

The first respondent-Estate Officer, Meerut Cantt. Meerut passed an order dated 6 July 2015 purportedly under Section 5A of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (Act, 1971) directing demolition of unauthorized construction on the land at Bungalow No. 64 Chppel Street, Meerut Cantt. belonging to the Union of India. Aggrieved, petitioner preferred an appeal before the District Judge, Meerut under Section 9 of Act 1971, by order dated 14 July 2015 District Judge questioned the maintainability of the appeal under Section 9 against an order passed under Section 5A. Petitioner apprehending demolition has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution assailing the aforementioned orders.

2. Sri Ashok Mehta, learned Additional Solicitor General, Govt. of India assisted by Sri Krishna Agarwal would submit that against an order passed under Se