SIDDHARTH
Mayank Babu Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Joint Development Commissioner, Allahabad – Respondent
SIDDHARTH, J.
1. Heard Sri Pradeep Verma assisted by Ms. Arti Agrawal learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. The above noted writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the punishment order dated 30.3.1999 passed by the respondent No.1 and for a direction to the respondent No.1 to treat him in service and pay salary and allowances as per rules.
3. The brief facts of the petition are that the petitioner was appointed on compassionate basis on the post of Junior Assistant Clerk vide order dated 03.7.1990. It is alleged that the respondent No.2 was not favaourably disposed towards the petitioner and he used to harass him in various ways. The petitioner made a complaint to the respondent No.1 against misdeeds of respondent No.2 and at his behest, he was charge-sheeted for the charges of insubordination, hindrance to official work, delay in preparing bills and unauthorized absence from duties. The petitioner could not submit the reply to the charge-sheet on account of illness and, therefore, an exparte inquiry was conducted against him. No second show cause notice against the proposed penalty was issued to h
Punjab National Bank vs. A.I.P.N.B.E. Federation
Imperial Tobacco Co.Ltd. vs. Its Workmen
State of U.P. & another Vs. T.P. Lal Srivastava
Subhash Chandra Sharma Vs. Managing Director & another
Subhas Chandra Sharma v. U.P. Co-operative Spinning Mills and others
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Saroj Kumar Sinha
Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank
Meenglas Tea Estate V. The workmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.