SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1939 Supreme(All) 113

VERMA
Mt. Maharaji Kuar – Appellant
Versus
Mangai Pande – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Verma, J. - This is an appeal by the defendants. The suit was for a declaration that a compromise entered into on 28th March 1933, in a suit u/s 123, Agra Tenancy Act, in the Court of the Assistant Collector in charge of the sub-division, filed by Rambujh Dube and Mt. Surajpati against Mt. Maharaji, would not be binding on the plaintiff and would not affect his rights on the death of Mt. Maharaji, defendant 1, because Rambujh Dube and Mt. Surajpati Kunwar, defendants 3 and 4, are persons who have no right or interest in the tenancy in question. The Court of first instance dismissed the suit, but on appeal by the plaintiff, Mangai Pande, the suit has been decreed by the lower Appellate Court. The following pedigree shows the relationship of the principal parties:

                RAMGHULAM PANDE    ____________________|_________________    |                                    |Bhagwan Pande                      Dhaneshar Pande    |                            = Mt. Maharaji, deft. 1Mangai Pande,                            |plaintiff.                        Mt. Surajpati, deft. 4                                         |                                 Rambujh Dube, deft, 3.

2. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top