JUDGMENT

1. These two connected appeals arise out of a suit for possession of zamindari shares in certain villages specified in the plaint and for manse profits.

2. The relationship between the parties would appear from the following pedigree.

            Hidayat Ullah Khan=Masrur-un-nissa                            |-------------------------------------------------------|                 |            |                      |Amanat Ullah   Mohit Ullah    Halima Begam   Azmat Ullah--Kaniz               Defendant      Plaintiff      Fatima Defendant               No. 1                          No. 2

3. Hidayat Ullah Khan the father of Halima Begam the plaintiff had zamindari property in two villages Akbarpur and Bisaulia. His wife Musammat Masrur-un-nissa (the plaintiffs mother) owned property in two other villages Bilauna and Harairpur. Hidayat, Ullah died in 1885 and Masrur-un-nissa died in 1890, leaving three sons Amanat Ullah, Azmat Ullah and Mohit Ullah (defendant No. 1) and one daughter Halima Begam the plaintiff.

4. The plaintiff's case is that on the death of her father and mother she succeeded to a share of 40 sihams out of 280 sihams in her parents' property in the four villages