SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2803

SIDDHARTH
Singhasan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Diwakar Mishra
For the Respondent: Mangla Prasad Rai

JUDGMENT :

Heard Sri Diwakar Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel as well as Sri Mangla Prasad Rai, learned Counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioner has filed the above noted writ petition, praying for the following reliefs:

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the orders dated 11.12.2015 and 31.10.2011 (Annexure Nos.12 and 2 to the writ petition) passed by General Manager (Karmik), U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow, respondent no.2, and Regional Manager, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Varanasi Region, Varanasi, respondent no.3 respectively;

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay all the retiral benefits i.e., gratuity, leave encashment etc., to the petitioner within stipulated period, prescribed by this Hon’ble Court;

(iii) Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which his Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case;

3. The petitioner’s case is that he was appointed as Driver in the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Ghazipur on 25.04.1989. At the time of his appointment, is educa









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top