DEVENDRA KUMAR ARORA
Ram Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director/Secretary – Respondent
Devendra Kumar Arora, J.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manoj Singh, Counsel for the respondent-Corporation.
2. Ram Kumar, who is said to be working as Assistant/In-charge Fertilizer Sale Centre, Laharapur, District Sitapur feeling aggrieved by the order of dismissal dated 17.8.2000 passed by the Managing Director/Secretary, U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Ltd as also the order dated 3.4.2001 passed by the Appellate Authority rejecting the appeal, has filed the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution primarily on the ground that order of dismissal is based on the defective ex-parte inquiry which was conducted in total disregard of the principles of natural justice and he was not Center In-charge being a class IV employee.
3. According to learned Counsel for the petitioner the petitioner was a confirmed class IV employee of the U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation and was working on the post of Chowkidar/Peon at the time of passing of order of dismissal. Though the petitioner was not qualified for the post of Centre In-charge, but was asked by the higher authorities, with an oblique motive, to work as In-charge of the Centre. Whi
Choksi Tube Company Limited v. Union of India
Girish Chandra Srivastava v. State of U.P. and others
Imperial Tobacco Co. Ltd. v. Its Workmen
Kashinath Dikshita v. Union of India and others
Mangla Prasad Mishra v. D.I.O.S., Jaunpr and others
Meenglas Tea Estate v. Its Workmen
Naseem Bano v. State of U.P. and others
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Chintaman Sadashiva Waishampayan
State of U.P. v. Shatrughan Lal and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.