SUDHIR AGARWAL, RANJANA PANDYA
GIRISH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard Sri Shishir Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents.
2. The writ petition is directed against order dated 14.10.2005 passed by Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Government of U.P., Lucknow imposing punishment of dismissal upon petitioner from the post of Assistant Engineer in Public Works Department.
3. The only ground of challenge pressed before this Court is that though a major penalty has been imposed upon petitioner but no oral inquiry whatsoever was conducted by Inquiry Officer. After submission of charge-sheet without holding any oral inquiry and recording of statement of witnesses, Inquiry Officer straightway submitted report and thereafter punishment of dismissal has been imposed upon petitioner on the basis of said inquiry report. Our attention is drawn to para 3 of writ petition, which reads as under:
“3. That the Enquiry Officer did not hold any enquiry in the matter. No opportunity of oral hearing was given to the petitioner by the Enquiry Officer and no opportunity was given to the petitioner to appear and participate in the enquiry. The petitioner was never informed about the date, t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.