SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 381

YASHWANT VARMA
Rajat Aren – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prabhakar Awasthi, Adv., Rajat Aren, Adv., Satish Kumar Rai, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Yashwant Varma, J.

A. A BRIEF OUTLINE

Heard the petitioner who has appeared in person and Sri S.K. Rai, learned counsel who has appeared for the respondents 1 to 7.

2. Initially when the writ petition was instituted the petitioner had chosen to implead two Platoon Commanders of the Officers Training Academy, Chennai [hereinafter referred to as the "Academy"] as party respondents by name. However, pursuant to permission sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner appearing then, these two respondents were deleted from the array of parties as recorded in the order dated 14 September 2017. The instant writ petition had been preferred originally seeking the following reliefs:

"(iii). "Issue a writ, order or directions in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records of the case and to quash the relegation dated 07.08.2017 (not communicated to the petitioner), show cause notice dated 08.08.2017, 27.07.2017 and the order dated 11.08.2017 whereby the petitioner has been sent on leave as also the order dated 31.08.2017 whereby the request of the petitioner for reconside



























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top