JUDGMENT :

Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.

Heard Sri Ashish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant and Sri Udai Chandani and Sri Nimai Dass, learned counsel for the defendants-respondents.

Facts

2. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that the plaintiff-appellant was one of the Directors in the respondent no.1 Company. The defendant-respondent No.1 is a Limited Company. It purchased an immovable property being House No.19/1, B.L.K.-B, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase -2, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the "disputed property"). The plaintiff-appellant and the defendant-respondent No.2 and their family members were Directors in six companies, namely, M/s. Himalayan Bioxteracts Pvt. Ltd., Kamero Technosys Ltd., Virat Residency Ltd., Dynacon Cares Ltd., Dynacon Systems Ltd. and Duet Marketing Pvt. Ltd. The plaintiff-appellant and the defendant-respondent no.2 and their two guests drawn Minutes of the Meeting dated 10.2.2016, which is reproduced below :-

"MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE DIRECTORS OF KAMERO TECHNOSYS LIMITED HELD ALONGWITH TWO OTHER GUESTS ON 1