JUDGMENT :

Sudhir Agarwal, J.

Heard Sri Vimlesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2. None appeared on behalf of respondent even in the revise call.

2. This writ petition has been filed against order dated 15.01.2005 (Annexure 9 to this writ petition) passed by respondent 3 whereby petitioner has been terminated from service.

3. The facts stated in writ petition shows that petitioner was appointed as Peon on 29.08.2003 by respondent 3, Principal, Kaushambi Inter College Mau, District Chitrakoot (hereinafter referred to as 'College') and since then he is working continuously. On 17.11.2004, Principal of College placed petitioner under suspension. Order of suspension was issued by Principal of College without seeking approval from District Inspector of School, Chitrakoot (hereinafter referred to as "DIOS"). Petitioner made a representation against suspension order vide letter dated 06.12.2004 (Annexure 3 to the writ petition) and thereafter on 30.12.2004, he received a charge-sheet dated 26.12.2004 issued by Principal of College. In the meantime, petitioner also received a letter dated 24.12.2004 issued by Sri Shiv Pratap Mi