SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 1967

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Mohd Faiz Alam Khan, JJ.
Siya Ram And Another - Appellants
Vs.
State of U.P. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 635 of 2005, 644 of 2005
Decided On : 08-11-2019

Advocates Appeared:
S.H. Ibrahim, Adv., Neeraj Sahu, Adv., Sunil Kumar Singh, Adv., S.C. Gupta, Adv.

The court established that the appellants, acting in common intent during a sudden quarrel, caused fatal injury leading to conviction under Section 304(II) IPC rather than murder, emphasizing sudden provocation without premeditation.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 302, 323, 325, 34 - Criminal Appeals against conviction for murder and other offences - Appellants convicted for committing murder in a heated quarrel over prior enmity; court established that appellants attacked with lathis, resulting in one fatal injury - Court determined no right of private defence available to accused - Appellants' conviction under Section 304(II) IPC established. (Paras 1-30)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were convicted for murder resulting from a brawl that arose due to old enmity regarding the use of a passage for a tractor trolley, during which Raja Ram was injured and later died. (Paras 1-6)

Findings of Court:
The evidence of injured witnesses was credible; appellants acted with common intention, resulting in Raja Ram's death. (Paras 25-28)

Issues: The court addressed whether the appellants exercised a right of private defence and the sufficiency of evidence for conviction. (Paras 5, 19)

Ratio Decidendi: The court found no premeditated intention to kill and concluded that the appellants acted in a sudden fight, leading to a conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC instead of Section 302. (Paras 29-31)

Result: Appeals partly allowed; conviction modified to Section 304(II) IPC with a sentence of 9 years rigorous imprisonment. (Para 31)

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and background facts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding evidence and injuries. (Para 17 , 18)
3. court's observations on evidence and witness reliability. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. ratio decidendi regarding common intention and conviction. (Para 24 , 25 , 27 , 28)
5. final conclusion on conviction and sentencing. (Para 30)

JUDGMENT :

Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, J.

Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Singh Learned counsel for the appellants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

2. Aforesaid criminal appeals No. 635 of 2005 and 644 of 2005 have been filed by the appellants Siya ram, Data Ram, Ram Ratan and Ram Sewak respectively, against the judgment and order dated 11.4.2005, passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.3, Hardoi, in S.T. No. 288 of 1995, arising out of Crime No. 36 of 1994, relating to Police Station Manjhila, District Hardoi, whereby the appellants have been convicted and sentenced, under Section 302 /34 IPC for life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 10,000/- each, in default of payment of fine two years R.I., under Section 325 /34 for five years R.I. and fine of Rs. 5000/- each, in default of payment of fine for one year R.I. and under Section 323 /34 for six months R.I.

    For the sake of convenience and to avoid repetition of facts and evidence, both appeals are being decided together by common judgment.

3. The prosecution story as emerges from the record of the subordinate court is, that a written application was presented on 28.3.1994 at 9.15 A.M. to S.H.O., Police Station Manjhila, District Hardoi by Raja Ram s/o Dwarika Prasad, R/o Lokpur, Majra Kusuma, Police Station Manjhila, District Hardoi, stating therein that on 27.3.1994 at about 8.00 P.M., when he was going to extend Holi greetings, Siya Ram son of Kuber Kachi, Data Ram, Ram Ratan and Ram Sewak both sons of Bihari, who are residents of the same village, for the reason of old enmity pertaining to the passage of tractor trolley of Raja Ram, assaulted him with sticks. On an alarm raised by him, Ram Ratan son of Dwarika R/o Lokpur, Police Station Manjhila, District Hardoi, Dinesh Kumar son of Raja Ram, Ram Swaroop son of Bulaki, Hari Shankar and Majnu arrived at the spot to save him, however, they were also assaulted by the above accused persons with lathis (sticks). Hue and cry made by all of them attracted Babu Ram son of Dwarika, Ram Lal son of Immer and many other villagers, who challenged the accused persons and saved him and others from accused persons. It is further stated that the accused persons after extending threats and hurling abuses to them, fled away from the scene of occurrence.

4. On the basis of above, written application a First Information Report (Ex. Ka-1) was registered at Police Station Manjhila on 28.3.1994 at 9.15 A.M. against the above accused persons at Case Crime No. 36 of 1994, under Sections 323 , 504, 506 IPC and Investigation of the same was entrusted to Sub Inspector Shri Krishna Murari Mishra.

5. The medical examination of the injuries of the injured persons was done by P.W.9- Dr. A.K. Jain on 28.3.1994 from 12.30 onwards who reported as under:-

    Injured Majanu was examined by Dr. A.K. Jain on 28.3.1994 at about 12.30 P.M. at P.H.C. Shahabad, who was identified by Constable 316 Ram Singh of Police Station Manjhila and following injuries were found on his person:-

    (I) Injury No.1- lacerated wound 1.5 cm. X 1 cm. X scalp deep on the (Rt) side of head 4.5 cm. above root of nose clotts present.

    (II) Contusion 4.5 cm. X 2 cm. To outer aspect and lower part of (Rt) forearm 1 cm. Above (Rt) wrist joint.

    All injuries were found simple in nature caused by blunt object and duration was about one day.

    On the same day at about 12.40 P.M. injured Nanhi was examined and a contusion of 5 cm. x 4 cm. on her lower eyelid red was found and injury was found simple caused by blunt object. Duration was about one day.

    On the same day at about 12.50 P.M. injured Hari Shankar was examined and fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top