RAMESH SINHA
Ramayan Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Today, Sri Anil Kumar Mishra has filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2 which is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Imran Ullah, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2, Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. By means of present 482 Cr.P.C. application, the applicant has prayed for quashing of the entire proceedings of case crime no. 263 of 2018 under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 201, 120-B I.P.C., police station Jahanganj, District Azamgarh.
4. The brief facts of the case are that an F.I.R. was lodged by opposite party no. 2 Smt. Asha Devi on 11.12.2018 at police station Jahanganj, District Azamgarh for the offence under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 201, 120-B I.P.C. with an allegation that the applicant had helped the father of the accused of a case of rape by changing the date of birth of her minor daughter, namely, Km. Shikha Singh. It is alleged that on 13.5.2018, one Arvind @ Kallu had committed rape of the daughter of the complainant for which an F.I.R. was lodged by her which was registered as case crime no. 116 of 2018. It seems that th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.