SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Geeta Devi – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard Sri. H.N. Singh, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri. Vineet Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Atul Dayal, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri. Ayush Khanna, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The petitioner through present petition has assailed the order dated 30.09.2019 passed by Judge, Small Causes Court, Allahabad in Miscellaneous Case No. 812 of 2017 arising out of Execution Case No. 6 of 2017 rejecting the petitioner's application under Section 47 of C.P.C. and order dated 27.11.2019 passed by the Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Allahabad in Civil Revision No. Nil of 2019 preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 30.09.2019.
3. The facts giving rise to the present petition are that premises bearing Municipal No. 599 (Old) (New No. 1008) situated in Mutthiganj, Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as ‘disputed premises’) was owned by Smt. Chameli Devi and Om Prakash (respondent no. 1), Rajendra Prasad (respondent no. 2) and Sri. Ram (respondent no. 3) grandsons of Smt. Chameli Devi. Respondent nos. 1 to 3 claimed the ownership of disputed premises on the basis of Will dated 28.12.1976 executed by Smt. Chameli Devi w
Badri Narain Jha and Others vs. Rameshwar Dayal Singh and Others
Dhannalal vs. Kalawatibai and Others
Ghantesher Ghosh vs. Madan Mohan Ghosh and Others
Hardeo Rai vs. Sakuntala Devi and Others
M.V.S. Manikayala Rao vs. M. Narasimhaswami and Others
Sri. Ram Pasricha vs. Jagannath and Others
Sidheshwar Mukherjee vs. Bhubneshwar Prasad Narain Singh
T. Lakshmipathi and Others vs. P. Nithyananda Reddy and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.