JUDGMENT :

Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J.

1. Heard Sri Vikrant Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs :

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to call for record of the case and to quash the order dated 19.2.2020 passed by the respondent no.5 by which the payment of his earlier work has been denied on false ground that the payment has already been made (annexure no.1 to the writ petition).

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to call for record of the case and to quash the order dated 11.2.2020 passed by the respondent no.5 by which the contract of the petitioner has been cancelled (annexure no.2 to the writ petition).

(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.5 to pay the rest amount of the work done by the petitioner immediately.

(iv) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to not to take any coercive action against the petitioner.

(v) Issue any other and further suitable writ, order or directi