IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
Purushottam Narayan - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. And Others - Respondents
Writ - A No. 2469 of 2022
Decided On : 01-04-2022
Constitution of India,1950 - Post of Constable Civil Police - Issued by Police Recruitment Board - Quashing result of medical examination - It is case of petitioner that an advertisement was issued by Police Recruitment Board of State of Uttar Pradesh being Advertisement in year for post of Constable Civil Police and Constable PAC - Petitioner being fully eligible applied for said post under general category and he was called for appearing in written test - Petitioner appeared and qualified in said written examination and thereafter appeared in Physical Efficiency Test/Physical Standard Test/Document Verification wherein he qualified hence petitioner was declared successful and his name was placed at serial of select list for post of Constable PAC under general category - On petitioner was called for medical examination whereby he has orally been informed that his candidature has been cancelled as he is suffering from varicose vein but copy of rejection order has not been supplied to petitioner - Feeling aggrieved by same petitioner filed an appeal before Regional Medical Committee Agra Division Agra wherein a date was fixed for medical examination on but the medical examination of petitioner was conducted - For same relief, second writ petition is not maintainable (Para 20).
Finding of the Court; This Court also agrees with observations made by Division Bench of this Court in aforesaid case - So far as two final judgments of Division Benches of this Court as well as two final judgments of Single Benches in cases of which have heavily been relied upon the by counsel for petitioner is concerned this Court finds that same are not applicable in facts present case as candidates of aforesaid cases have not been non-suited on ground of deficiency of Varicose Veins - Therefore same are clearly distinguishable from facts of the present case - interim orders in case of relied upon by counsel for petitioner are not binding upon this Court.
Result: Writ Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Anil Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pranav Ojha, Additional Chief Standing Counsel assisted by Mr. S.C. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has made following relief :
........."
3. Petitioner has also approached this Court earlier by means of Writ-A No. 13548 of 2021 (Purshottam Narayan Vs. State of U.P. Through Its Principal Secretary Home & 2 Others) for following relief :
4. The said writ petition has been dismissed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide judgment and order dated 18th October, 2021 in light of the detailed judgment of the Coordinate Bench of Court in the case of Ankit Kumar Vs. State of U.P. & 3 Others (Writ-A No. 5668 of 2021, decided on 3rd August, 2021).
5. It is the case of the petitioner that an advertisement was issued by the Police Recruitment Board of the State of Uttar Pradesh being Advertisement No. P.R.P.B. Ek.-1(138)/2018 II in the year 2018 for the post of Constable Civil Police and Constable PAC. The petitioner being fully eligible applied for the said post under general category and he was called for appearing in written test (computer based test). The petitioner appeared and qualified in the said written examination and thereafter appeared in Physical Efficiency Test/Physical Standard Test/Document Verification (P.S.T./D.V.), wherein he qualified, hence the petitioner was declared successful and his name was placed at serial no. 2435 of the select list for the post of Constable PAC under general category. On 13th August, 2021, the petitioner was called for medical examination, whereby he has orally been informed that his candidature has been cancelled as he is suffering from varicose vein but the copy of the rejection order has not been supplied to the petitioner. Feeling aggrieved by the same, petitioner filed an appeal before the Regional Medical Committee, Agra Division, Agra, wherein a date was fixed for medical examination on 22nd August, 2021 but the medical examination of the petitioner was conducted on 26th August, 2021. In the said medical examination, which was conducted under order of the Regional Medical Committee/Appellate Medical Board, the petitioner was unsuccessful. This time again, no written order was supplied to the petitioner as to for which reason, the petitioner was declared unsuccessful in both the medical examination. The petitioner was informed orally by the Appellate Medical Board that he was found unsuccessful in the medical examination due to Varicose Veins. The petitioner after having knowledge of the medical deficiency of the Varicose Veins, which was orally informed, approached the Ganesh Shanker Vidyarthi Medical College and Associated Hospital, Kanpur (U.P. Government Medical College) on 29th December, 2021 for detecting his deficiency of Varicose Veins, where the petitioner was medically examined with due diligence on 29th December, 2021 and he was absolutely found fit and no disease of Varicose Veins was seen by the Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Department of the G.S.V. Medical College, Kanpur.
6. Further, it is the case of the petitioner that since in two medical examinations conducted by the respondent-authorities the petitioner was orally informed by the Medical Boards that he is medically unfit due to the detection of Varicose Veins
Medical examination by the Medical Board consisting of medical experts under Rule 15(g) cannot be said to be inferior to the physical standard test conducted by a team of non-experts.
Candidates must exhaust all available remedies within the recruitment process before seeking judicial intervention, and the findings of Medical Boards in recruitment processes are generally upheld un....
Fresh independent medical exam ordered when initial and review by same hospital yield conflicting govt hospital opinion.
Conflicting medical opinions from review board at same hospital (within days) and subsequent independent government hospital warrant fresh medical examination by different board for fairness to provi....
once no mala fides are attributed and the doctors of the Forces who are well aware of the demands of duties of the Forces in the terrain in which the recruited personnel are required to work, have fo....
Conflicting medical reports warrant fresh independent re-examination for provisionally selected candidates.
Conflicting medical fitness opinions from government hospitals entitle merit-selected candidate to fresh independent re-examination, despite initial and review unfitness, without impugning medical bo....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.