Purushottam Narayan vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(All) 286

Purushottam Narayan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Anil Babu.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Anil Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pranav Ojha, Additional Chief Standing Counsel assisted by Mr. S.C. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the State-respondents.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has made following relief :

"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the respondent authorities to constitute a new Medical Board in Etawah or any other District for the fresh Medical Examination of the Petitioner under the supervision of the medical experts.

........."

3. Petitioner has also approached this Court earlier by means of Writ-A No. 13548 of 2021 (Purshottam Narayan Vs. State of U.P. Through Its Principal Secretary Home & 2 Others) for following relief :

(i) calling for records, (ii) quashing the result of the medical examination conducted by the Regional Health Examination dated 26th August, 2021, by which the candidatures of the petitioner has been rejected due to varicose vein, (iii) considering the candidature of the petitioner against the selected post, and (iv) conducting the medical test again."

4. The said writ petition has been dismissed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide judgm