Narendra Kumar Tripathi vs State Of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(All) 157

YASHWANT VARMA
Narendra Kumar Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Krishna Datta Tiwari
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Arun Kumar

JUDGMENT

Yashwant Varma, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar, learned counsel who appears for the respondents.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders of 3 July 2020 and 7 October 2020 passed by the respondents. In terms of the first order, it has been found upon due verification that the B.A. marksheet on the basis of which the petitioner obtained employment was forged. Consequent to that order, the services of the petitioner has been brought to an end. By the second order the respondents have also passed directions for recovery of all emoluments which have been paid to the petitioner. It becomes pertinent to note that the finding of the respondents that the petitioner obtained employment on the basis of a forged mark sheet is neither disputed nor challenged by the petitioner before this Court with learned counsel for the petitioner candidly stating that the petitioner had no defense to proffer.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner placing reliance on the decision rendered by a learned Judge in Abhiram Vs. State of U.P. And 3 Others, Writ - A No.8657 of 2020 decided on 02.11.2020 and the judgment of the Division Bench in Smt. Parmi Maurya Vs. Sta