IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
Suneeta Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others – Respondents
Writ -A No. 4845, 4571, 4882, 5728, 5914, 6716, 8587, 8595, 6966 of 2021
Decided on : 12-08-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of petitioners and their contractual issues. (Para 1 , 5) |
| 2. kasturba gandhi balika vidyalaya scheme and educational policies. (Para 3) |
| 3. legal principles regarding personal service contracts. (Para 4 , 24 , 34) |
| 4. issues of maintainability based on contractual nature. (Para 14 , 15 , 28) |
| 5. conclusions of the court on the merits of petitions. (Para 50 , 61) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, Sri Yatindra, Sri Pankaj Kumar Tyagi, Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, Sri Harshvardhan Gupta, Sri Ram Vilas Yadav, Sri Amit Shukla, Sri Santosh Kumar, Sri Ashok Kumar, Sri Syed Nadeem Ahmad learned counsels for the Basic Education Officers, Sri Durga Singh who appears for the State Project Director, Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan and Sri Bipin Bihari Pandey learned Chief Standing Counsel alongwith Sri Sanjay Chaturvedi for the State respondents.
2. This batch of writ petitions have been clubbed and heard for final disposal collectively with the consent of parties.
A. KASTURBA GANDHI BALIKA VIDYALAYA
3. All the petitioners were engaged by the respondents in residential schools established under the Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya Scheme[KGBV] launched by the Union Government. In August 2004, the Union Government launched a scheme for setting up of residential schools upto the upper primary level for girls belonging predominantly to the SC, ST, OBC and minorities in difficult areas. The scheme provided for the establishment of schools in educationally backward blocks. Priority was to be accorded to the establishment of these schools in areas having a concentration of SC, ST, OBC, minorities, tribal population and where enrollment of girls was found to be lagging. Areas with low female literacy and areas with a large number of small and scattered habitations in which educational facilities were nonexistent were also to be identified for the purposes of establishment of schools under the aforesaid scheme. With effect from 01 April 2008, the criteria for educationally backward block was revised to include those blocks where rural female literacy was below 30% and town/cities having minority concentration. Initially the scheme was run as a separate initiative of the Union Government till it came to be merged with the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan[SSA] with effect from 01 April 2007. With the promulgation of the Right to Education Act, 2009 [RTE] and the adoption of the framework for implementation of SSA being revised, the scheme and its objectives were revised to bring it in tune and harmony with the right and entitlement of children as envisaged under the RTE. In the State of U.P., the U.P. Education For All[UPEFA] society came to be formed in 1993 to oversee the field of Basic Education. The KGBV scheme is presently being administered by this entity.
B. THE SCHEME AND POLICY DIRECTIVES
4. The Scheme is based on two basic models (i) schools with a hostel for 100 girls and (ii) schools with hostel for 50 girls. Various Government Orders and directives of the Union Government have come to be issued from time to time in order to ensure a uniform implementation of the scheme throughout the country. The aforesaid Government Orders and directives apart from laying down norms for infrastructure and facilities in those residential schools also lay in place various stipulations relating to issues such as curriculum and the appointment of teachers and other staff. In terms of the policy directives the schools are to be managed by a Warden along with a complement of support staff and instructions are to be imparted by full time and part time teachers. For the purposes of the present batch of writ petitions, the directives and orders issued from time to time may be viewed commencing from the Government Order dated 29 July 2013. For the purposes of selection of teaching and non-teaching staff, the aforesaid Government Order provided
Bharati Reddy v. State of Karnataka And Others
Dr. Vandana Vahistha v. State of U.P. And Others
Executive Committee of Vaish Degree College
Executive Committee of U.P. State Warehousing Corporation, Lucknow v. C.K. Tyagi
Executive Committee of Vaish Degree College Vs. Lakshmi Narain and Others; (1976) 2 SCC 58
I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007) 2 SCC 1
Kailash Singh Vs. Mayo College
K.Krishnamacharyulu And Others v. Sri Venkateswara Hindu College of Engineering And Another
Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala and Anr. (1973) 4 SCC 225
L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) 3 SCC 261
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors. (1980) 3 SCC 625.
Ram Niwas Sharma Vs. Union of India and others
Roshan Lal Tandon v. Union of India
Roychan Abraham v. State of U.P. and Others
Rajesh Bhardwaj V. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.