SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
Nisha – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The instant application dated 27.11.2021 has been moved seeking extension of interim stay order dated 18.12.2012, which was not extended further after 12.4.2019.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that vide order dated 18.12.2012 further proceedings of Complaint Case No. 77 of 2012, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 403 I.P.C. pending before the Civil Judge (J.D.)/J.M. Deoband, Saharanpur was stayed till the next date of listing with a direction to list the case after eight weeks before the appropriate Bench, but the trial court under the garb of judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. and Another vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2018) 16 SCC 299 has proceeded in the matter. Much emphasis has been given by contending that the aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. and Another (supra) has been over ruled by the subsequent judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Fazalullah Khan vs. M. Akbar Contractor (D) by LRs. and Others, 2019 (8) ADJ 615 (SC), therefore, t
Fazalullah Khan vs. M. Akbar Contractor (D) by LRs. and Others
Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. and Another vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Point of law : Jurisdiction of High Court is not barred irrespective of label of a petition, be it under Section 397 or 482 Cr.P.C. or Article 227 of Constitution.
Indefinite stay orders in civil and criminal cases may lead to miscarriages of justice, necessitating a review of their validity and conditions for extension.
Stay on Court Proceedings – Order of stay granted by Division Bench in High Court cannot be treated as having no force.
The judgment emphasizes the need for a speaking order to extend the stay beyond six months, as per the judgment in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited and another Vs. Central Bureau of I....
Stay of criminal proceedings by the High Courts should not be considered as an incentive to cause delay in the proceedings; that order granting stay or extending it must be a speaking order and stay ....
Contempt Petition - Wilful and deliberate disobedience of order - Mere disobedience is not sufficient unless it is shown and proved that disobedience is wilful, deliberate and intentional.
(1) An interim order lawfully passed by a Court after hearing all contesting parties is not rendered illegal only due to long passage of time – If a High Court concludes after hearing all concerned p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.