IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Ajay Bhanot, J.
Shiva Kant - Petitioner
Vs.
State Of U.P. And Others - Respondent
WRIT - C No. - 22746 of 2021
Decided On : 03-12-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Writ petition - UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Section 161 - UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rules 144, 145 and 146 – Implementing the order - Direction sought upon respondent to implement order.
Finding of the court :
Court noticed callous attitude of land management committees towards litigation in regard to Gaon Sabha lands - In a sense Gaon Sabha lands are ultimately State lands - State Government entrusts such lands to Gaon Sabha - State Government by adopting procedure prescribed by law can also resume such lands - Higher public interest demands that State Government should exercise vigilance over exchange of such lands by Gaon Sabha with private lands - These observations do not dilute rights of Gaon Sabha accruing from entrustment made by State Government to Gaon Sabha - Considering fact that in a large number of cases under Section 161 of U.P.Z.A.&L.R. Act, interests of Gaon Sabha and State lands are compromised, it is directed that State of U.P. through District Magistrate shall be made necessary parties in all disputes pertaining to the Gaon Sabha's lands and in particular in proceedings under Section 161. It shall be mandatory for the State through the District Magistrate to file their affidavits in all such disputes.
Result : Writ petition dismissed
JUDGMENT :
1. By means of this writ petition, a direction has been sought upon the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Prayagraj, respondent No. 3-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Handia, District Prayagraj and respondent No. 4 Tehsildar, Tehsil Handia District Prayagraj to implement the order dated 26.06.2008 as well as order dated 16.06.2021 under Section 161 of the U.P.Z.A. & LR. Act [UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950].
2. The writ petition out of proceedings for exchange of private land with land of Gaon Sabha taken out under Section 161 of the U.P.Z.A.&L.R. Act. The provision is extracted hereinunder:
(a) any other bhumidhar [* * *] land held by him; or
(b) any [Gaon Sabha] or local authority, lands for the time being vested in it under Section 117 [* * *] :
Provided that no exchange shall be made except with the permission of an Assistant Collector who shall refuse permission if the difference between the rental value of land given in exchange and of land received in exchange calculated at hereditary rates is more than 10 per cent of the lower rental value.
(1-A) Where the Assistant Collector permits exchange he shall also order the relevant annual registers to be corrected accordingly.
(2) On exchange made in accordance with sub-section (1) they shall have the same rights in the land so received in exchange as they had in the land given exchange."
3. The provision has to be read with Rules 144 to 146 of the U.P.Z.A.&LR. Rules, 1952[UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1952] to understand its working. The Rules are extracted hereinbelow:
(1) The khasra number of the plots-
(a) [* * *] which the applicant wishes to receive and of the plots which he offers in exchange of,
(b) [* * *]
(2) certified copies of the khataunis relating'to the khatas in which all such plots are included;
(3) [* * *]
(4) a statement showing the details of any valid deeds mortgage or other encumbrances with which the lands to be exchanged may be burdened, together with the names and addresses of lessees, mortgagees or holders of other encumbrances.
145. On receipt of an application for [permission to make an]exchange of land the Assistant Collector [shall cause to be calculated the rental value of the land proposed to be given in exchange and of the land proposed to be received in exchange at hereditary rates and] if he is satisfied that the exchange is not invalid according to the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 161, call upon the parties, the lessees, mortgagees or holders of other encumbrances, if any, to show cause why the exchange should not be made. Every such notice shall be accompanied by a copy of the application which shall be supplied by the applicant.
146. The Assistant Collector shall thereupon decide the objections, if any, and pass suitable orders. If he decides that the exchange should be allowed, he shall also make an order for the delivery of possession, if necessary, and for the correction of papers.”
4. Section 161 of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 read with Rules 144, 145 and 146 of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Rules, 1952 together comprise the legislative scheme for exchange of private lands with Gaon Sabha.
5. While interpreting the aforesaid provision, a learned Single Judge of this Court in Shiv Murat Vs. Board of Revenue, U.P. at Allahabad, 2017 (7) ADJ 252 held as under:
Shiv Murat Vs. Board of Revenue, U.P. at Allahabad
Point of law : From the conjoint reading of Section 161, as well as, the Rules relating thereto, it transpires that the legislature has extended facility upon a bhumidhar to exchange his bhumidhari l....
Resolution by the Land Management Committee for land allotment without approval from the S.D.M. lacks legal validity, leading to unlawful possession claims.
The court emphasized the limitations on land allotment to educational institutions under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, and the discretionary power of the State Government i....
The authority's order beyond jurisdiction is void; the previous order remains intact while directing a merits-based decision on the pending application.
The Director (Consolidation) lacks the authority to approve land exchanges involving Gram Panchayat property; such matters must be resolved by the Panchayat for the benefit of all villagers.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.