SUNITA AGARWAL, KRISHAN PAHAL
Roshni Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Balmukund Tiwari – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present appeal is directed against the order of rejection of application of the daughter filed under Section 20(3) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 1956") seeking maintenance from her father. In the said application, she had claimed maintenance on two grounds; firstly that she had been doing nursing course and her mother had incurred huge expenditures in educating her. She was paying Rs.3500/-per month towards fee and there was no other source of income. She, therefore, demanded the fee being paid by her for continuing the said course. Another ground to seek maintenance was that the applicant-daughter was of marriageable age and she needed money towards marriage expenses which was the responsibility of her father.
2. The said application filed on 7.5.2015 had been rejected vide order dated 6.10.2017 on the ground that the fee receipts which were submitted by the applicant for pursuing the nursing course were of the year 2012. By the time the case was decided, she had completed the nursing course. Further after completion of the said course, the appellant got a job from which she was earning Rs.4500/-per month. It
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.