SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 315

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
Anuj Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and Others – Respondents
Writ (C) No. 33469 of 2021
Decided On : 01-04-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ram Pratap Yadav, Devbratt Yadav.

Point of Law: Constitution of the Gram Panchayat is the paramount objective to be achieved. Since the minimum quorum required to constitute the Gram Panchayat could not be met, despite two consecutive elections and passage of one year time, the State Government or the Officer authorised by it, must ensure constitution of the Gram Panchayat or its Administrative Committee through other means, permitted by the statute.

Headnote:

Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Section 12-E(2) - UP Panchayat Raj (Election of Member, Pradhan and UP-Pradhan Rules, 1994) - Rule 60(2) - Section 12(3)(d) - Posts on which elected members - Declaration of deemed vacancy – Writ petition has been filed by petitioner claiming to be duly elected Gram of village Development Block District - He claims relief in nature of direction upon District Magistrate to assign financial and administrative powers to petitioner to enable him to discharge all functions of Gram Pradhan - Upon perusal of pleadings made in writ petition as confirmed by counter affidavit filed by District Panchayat Raj Officer it transpires undisputedly petitioner was elected as Gram Panchayat Development Block District on - His term is five years - Almost one year has passed and petitioner has yet not been able to function as Gram Pradhan - Functioning of petitioner has been obstructed on account of non-constitution of Gram Panchayat Bhauli - In that regard it has been clearly disclosed in the counter affidavit filed by District Panchayat Raj Officer that Gram Panchayat Bhauli comprises of wards - Election to all wards of said Gram Panchayat first took place on ward members elected only could be administered oath - The Constitution of the Gram Panchayat is the paramount objective to be achieved. Since the minimum quorum required to constitute the Gram Panchayat could not be met, despite two consecutive elections and passage of one year time, the State Government or the Officer authorised by it, must ensure constitution of the Gram Panchayat or its Administrative Committee through other means, permitted by the statute- Para 16.

Finding of the Court: Constitution of Gram Panchayat is paramount objective to be achieved - Since minimum quorum required to constitute Gram Panchayat could not be met despite two consecutive elections and passage of one year time State Government or Officer authorised by it must ensure constitution of Gram Panchayat or its Administrative Committee through other means permitted by statute - Accordingly writ petition is allowed with a direction upon respondents to take cognizance of matter and pass appropriate orders with respect to declaration of deemed vacancy on post of members of Gram Panchayat who may still refuse to subscribe to oath despite further notice to be issued to them now - For that purpose time limit of three weeks from today is fixed - Either such oath would be made and subscribed by minimum five elected members so as to complete quorum of members on or before or a declaration of deemed vacancy Section 12-E of the Act would be made with respect to above at end of that time limit.

Result: Petitioner may be Allowed.

JUDGMENT :

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.

1. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 today, is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri. Ram Pratap Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

3. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner Anuj Kumar, claiming to be the duly elected Gram Pradhan of village Bhauli, Development Block Kurara, Tehsil-Hamirpur, District-Hamirpur. He claims relief in the nature of direction upon the District Magistrate-Hamirpur to assign financial and administrative powers to the petitioner to enable him to discharge all functions of Gram Pradhan.

4. Upon perusal of the pleadings made in the writ petition as confirmed by the counter affidavit filed by the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Hamirpur, it transpires, undisputedly the petitioner was elected as the Gram Pradhan, Gram Panchayat Bhauli, Development Block Kurara, District-Hamirpur on 02.05.2021. His term is five years. Almost one year has passed and the petitioner has yet not been able to function as the Gram Pradhan. Functioning of the petitioner has been obstructed on account of non-constitution of the Gram Panchayat Bhauli. In that regard, it has been clearly disclosed in the counter affidavit filed by the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Hamirpur that Gram Panchayat Bhauli comprises of 15 wards. Election to all 15 wards of the said Gram Panchayat first took place on 02.05.2021. Of the 15 ward members elected, only 2 could be administered oath. The remaining 13 did not present themselves for administration of oath as ward members of the Gram Panchayat Bhauli, despite reminders.

5. Acting in conformance to Section 12-E(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) 13 elected members of the Gram Panchayat Bhauli who failed to subscribe to the oath of office, were deemed to have vacated office/seat vide order dated 10.11.2021.

6. The document filed as Annexure CA-3 to the counter affidavit further reveals, pursuant to the order of the State Election Commission dated 06.01.2021, the bye election to the aforesaid 13 vacant wards were held and 13 members were elected. This time only 3 of the members so elected could be administered oath. The remaining 10 have yet not subscribed to the oath. The counter affidavit does not state as to whether the said 10 persons have been deemed to have vacated the office/seat of member of Gram Panchayat, Bhauli.

7. In such facts, it has been stated in the counter affidavit and has been vehemently urged by the learned Standing Counsel that the Gram Panchayat has yet not been constituted in accordance with Section 12(3) of the Act. Unless 2/3 elected members subscribe to the oath, the Gram Panchayat cannot be constituted. Since the strength of the Gram Panchayat, Bhauli is 15, necessarily, 10 members must subscribe to the oath before the petitioner may be allowed to function as a fullfledged Gram Pradhan.

8. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, there can be no denial that the Gram Panchayat may be constituted only upon 2/3 members of the total strength of the Gram Panchayat being elected. In the present case, that number would have to be 10. This position emerges from the plain reading of Section 12(3)(d) read with its proviso. It reads:

    “12(3)(d) The Constitution of a Gram Panchayat shall be notified in such manner as may be prescribed and thereupon the Gram Panchayat shall be deemed to have been duly constituted, any vacancy therein notwithstanding:

Provided that the Constitution of a Gram Panchayat shall not be so notified till the Pradhan and at least two-thirds of the members of the Gram Panchayat have been elected.”

9. Then, Section 12-E of the Act reads as below:

    “12-E. Oath of office:

(1) [Every person] shall, before entering upon any office referred to in Sections 11-A, 12, 43 or 44, make and subscribe before such authority as may be prescribed on oath or affirmation in the form to be

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top