Back
RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Jubeda Bano – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Piyush Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for opposite party Nos.1 to 4 and Sri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party No.5.
2. On the first date of admission, this Court has passed the order dated 12.08.2021 as under :-
In compliance of the judgment and order passed by this Court vide order dated 14.12.2020 in Writ Petition No.11079 (S/S) of 2020, the respondent has passed the impugned order dated 14.7.2021, rejecting the claim of the petitioner.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent has not applied its mind and in total disregard of the direction issued by this Court, has proceeded to pass the impugned order. Next submission is that the petitioner has passed his high school examination from the C.B.S.E. Board. In the mark sheet, only grade is provided and specified the percentage of marks grade-wise. By multiplying the total marks of
Point of law: If any candidate discloses/ declares his/ her details erroneously without having relevant documents supporting the same, his/ her candidature shall be cancelled
The candidature of a candidate is liable to be cancelled only if the candidate puts himself/herself in an advantaged position by committing a mistake while submitting the online application form.
Candidates who fill incorrect marks that disadvantage them should not have their candidature cancelled, while those who gain an advantage through errors may face disqualification.
Candidates should not be penalized for minor discrepancies in reported marks if such discrepancies do not affect the overall merit list, as per the provisions of the relevant government orders.
on a reading of the Government Order and Circulars applicable it is quite clear that wherever a candidate had put himself in a disadvantageous position as stated above his candidature shall not be ca....
Appellant has failed to make out a case for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to rectify the mistake made by her in her online submission
Fraudulent documentation undermines claims for educational qualifications, disallowing entitlement effects from misrepresentation; courts emphasize integrity in certification processes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
