SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Sita Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. On oral request of learned counsel for the petitioner, Principal Secretary Urban Planning and Development, Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, is allowed to be impleaded as respondent no. 4.
2. Necessary correction in the array of parties be carried out during the course of the day.
3. Heard Sri Chandra Shekher Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Patanjali Mishra, learned A.G.A. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Sri V.K. Ojha, learned counsel for respondent no. 3.
4. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:-
ii. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent no. 4 not to arrest the Petitioner during the pendency of this writ petition."
5. The petitioner is the wife of a retired army personnel. It appears that in the year 2013-2014, she started constructions ov
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.