JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 & 6, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. In compliance of order dated 12.04.2022, the respondent no. 5 & 6 produced the corpus Prakhar Singhania @ Palash before this Court.

3. On interaction and some queries, the corpus replied that he does not want to live with his father. He said that his name is Prakhar Singhania and he is studying in D.A.V. Public School, Ghaziabad. He further stated that he does not want to meet his father.

4. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that corpus is the son of petitioner no. 2. The corpus Master Prakhar Singhaniya is currently residing with his maternal grand-father and grand-mother i.e. respondent no. 5 & 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner no. 2 simply wants visitation rights to meet his son i.e. corpus. Further submitted that as petitioner no. 2 is the father of corpus, so he should be given visitation rights at least twice in a month and at the festivals of Holi and Diwali.

5. Learned counsel for respondent no. 5 & 6 submitted that the corpus does not want to meet his father i.e.