JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.

1. Heard Sri Dharm Pal Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General alongwith Sri Sanjay Sharma, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State respondents and Sri Satyendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.4.

2. The present petition has been filed for a writ of habeas corpus praying for the following reliefs:

"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the corpus before this Hon'ble Court and the petitioner no.1 be allowed to remain in the company of the petitioner no.2.

(ii) issue a writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to resolve the matrimonial dispute, if any, by amicable dialogue, mediation or court expeditiously and the visiting rights be granted to the petitioner no.2 as he is being denied access to meet his child.

(iii) issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

(iv) award cost of the petition to the petitioners."

3. The order sheet of the case indicates that at the very outset when the ca