Pankaj – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard Sri Ramakar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and Ms. Shobha Rajpoot, Advocate holding brief of Sri Shiv Shankar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 i.e. the complainant/ informant.
2. Learned Additional Government Advocate has filed counter affidavit, today in the Court, the same is taken on record.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit, today in the Court, the same is taken on record. Sri Shukla has also filed certified copy of the F.I.R. and the order-sheet of learned trial court showing the status of trial on various dates, the same are also taken on record.
4. This is the third bail application. The first bail application has been rejected on 26.02.2015 by Hon'ble Surendra Vikram Singh Rathore, J. (since retired). The second bail application has been rejected on 20.09.2017 by Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Mishra-II, J. (since retired).
5. The first bail application of the present applicant was rejected on merits and the second bail application of the applicant was rejected on the ground that no knew facts have been pointed out to consider th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.