Prashant Kumar vs State of U. P. - 2022 Supreme(All) 512

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(All) 512

MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Prashant Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Atipriya Gautam, Ishir Sripat, Rishabh Kesarwani.

JUDGMENT :

MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

1. Heard Mr. Vijay Gautam, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Rishabh Kesarwani, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 31.03.2022 passed by the respondent no. 6, (enclosed as Annexure no. 1) to the writ petition by which the candidature of the petitioner for selection/appointment on the post of Constable Civil Police and Constable PAC, Direct Recruitment 2018-II has been cancelled.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondent authorities, to appoint the petitioner finally for the post of Constable Civil Police and Constable PAC, Direct Recruitment 2018-II, pursuant to the advertisement dated 16.11.2018 and in pursuance of the select list issued vide notification dated 02.03.2020 with all consequential benefits.

(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent authorities, to send the petitioner for necessary training on the post of Constab