SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 561

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW)
RAMESH SINHA, SAROJ YADAV, JJ.
Sanjay Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.1387 of 2013
Decided on : 07-07-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Jaikaran

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 498-A, 323, 504, 302, 304 – Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 – Section 3, 4 – Criminal Appeal – Offence of murder – Causing death by negligence – Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt – Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty – Criminal Appeal has been filed by appellant against judgment and order passed by Special Judge (E.C.) Act/ Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.4, Rae Bareli in Sessions Trial arising out of Crime No.31 of 2007 under Section 498-A, 323, 504 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act – Whereby convict/appellant has been held guilty and sentenced under Section 498A, 302 of I.P.C. and Section 4 of D.P. Act, Police Station, District – Held, Learned counsel for convict/appellant very vehemently argued that deceased was not treated medically well, therefore she died, as she was not so badly burnt as to die – So offence can travel only upto offence punishable under Section 304 of I.P.C. instead of Section 302 of I.P.C – This argument of defence counsel is also of no value – Medical-examination report, Exhibit Ka-4 where deceased was first examined in a burnt condition, it has been noted that superficial to deep burn was found on body and she was found 55 to 65 percent burnt and referred to District Hospital for treatment – In Exhibit Ka-2 which is 'bed-head-ticket' of deceased issued District Hospital Rae Bareli it has been noted that 55 to 65 percent burn injuries were present on body of victim – Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Saroj Yadav, J.

1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 13/14.08.2013 passed by Special Judge (E.C.) Act/ Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.4, Rae Bareli in Sessions Trial No.116 of 2007 (State Vs. Sanjay Singh) arising out of Crime No.31 of 2007 under Section 498-A, 323, 504 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short I.P.C.) and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act (in short D.P. Act). Whereby the convict/appellant has been held guilty and sentenced under Section 498A, 302 of I.P.C. and Section 4 of the D.P. Act, Police Station Shivgarh, District Rae Bareli. The convict has been awarded the following sentences :-

Sl. No.

Sections

Sentences awarded

1.

Under section 498-A I.P.C.

Rigorous imprisonment of three years coupled with a fine of Rs.5,000/-and in default of payment of fine, six months simple imprisonment.

2.

Under section 302 I.P.C.

Life imprisonment coupled with a fine of Rs.20,000/-and in default of payment of fine, two years additional imprisonment.

3.

Under section 4 of D.P. Act.

Rigorous imprisonment of two years coupled with a fine of Rs.5,000/-and in default of payment of fine, three months simple imprisonment.

2. The facts in short, necessary for disposal of this appeal are as under:-

    (i) A First Information Report (in short FIR) was registered at Case Crime No.31 of 2007, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 307 of I.P.C. and Section ¾ of D.P. Act, Police Station Shivgarh, District Rae Bareli, on the basis of a the written report submitted by the complainant Ajeet Pratap Singh. In the written report it was narrated that elder sister of the complainant Manju Singh was married to Sanjay Singh about 10 years ahead. His brother-in-law used to harass and torture his sister soon after the marriage and used to say that her parents had not given sufficient dowry and they just show that they were rich people. Sanjay Singh used to ask his sister to bring a buffalo and a motorcycle, otherwise he will not let her live with peace. One son was born to his sister out of this wedlock. Sanjay Singh started to live separately in a house situated adjacent to his parents. After this he started torturing and harassing his sister more and pressurized her to bring a buffalo and a motorcycle. When his sister refused to accede to the demands he frequently used to beat and torture her. Due to this harassment and torture his sister came to her parental house, about 5 months before and started to live there. About one month ahead, brother of her father-in-law died, therefore, his sister went to his matrimonial home Jagatpur. When she was coming back, her mother-in-law and father-in-law asked her to stay there and assured that now Sanjay Singh has reformed himself. On this she stayed there and started to live with Sanjay Singh.

(ii) On 25.01.2007 he received a phone call from village Ahasan Jagatpur that Sanjay Singh has set ablaze Manju after pouring Kerosene oil. On this the complainant, his younger brother Sonu Singh, cousin Santosh and many other people of the village went to village Ahasan Jagatpur and found that his sister was badly burnt. The smell of kerosene oil was coming out from her body. His sister Manju told him that Sanjay Singh has set her ablaze after beating and dousing with kerosene oil. His sister was being carried by Sonu Singh and Santosh Singh to hospital in Bachhrawa. The condition of his sister was very serious.

(iii) After registration of the FIR investigation started. The dying declaration of the deceased was recorded by Mr. Piyush Srivastava, 'Naib Tehsildar' in the hospital where the deceased was under treatment. The deceased died during treatment on 29.01.2007 in the hospital. The written information of death was given by the complainant at the concerned police station (Exhibit Ka-18). After in

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top