MANOJ MISRA, SAMEER JAIN
Harendra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sameer Jain, J.
1. Harendra (the appellant) was convicted under Sections 302, 201, 376-AB IPC and Section 5(m)/6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short POCSO Act) vide judgment and order dated 14.7.2021 and 15.7.2021 passed by Special Judge (POCSO Act), Bulandshahar in Sessions Trial No. 625 of 2021 and has been awarded following punishment :
2. Under Section 201 IPC, seven years R.I. with a fine of Rs. Twenty Thousand, and in default four months simple imprisonment; and
3. Under Section 5(m)/6 of POCSO Act read with Section 376 AB IPC, death penalty.
All sentences to run concurrently.
2. As the trial court awarded death penalty to the appellant (Harendra) under Sections 302 IPC and Section 5(m)/6 of POCSO Act read with Section 376 AB IPC, it has sent a reference for confirmation of death penalty, which has been registered as Reference No.9 of 2021.
3. Against the aforesaid judgment and order, the appellant has submitted his appeal from Jail, which has been forwarded by the Superintendent of Jail, Bulandshahar vide letter dated
Sarad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra (1984) 4 SCC 116
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra (1973) 2 SCC 793
Pandurang Chandrakant Mhatre and others Vs. State of Maharashtra (2009) 10 SCC 773
Manubhai Ratilal Patel v. State of Gujarat
D.K.Basu Vs. Union of India (1997) 1 SCC 416
Rammi alias Rameshar Vs. State of M.P. (1999) 8 SCC 649
Sudam alias Rahul Kaniram Jadhav Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2019) 9 SCC 388
Swamy Shraddananda v. State of Karnataka
Shatrughan Baban Meshram Vs. State of Maharashtra
Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 1980 (2) SCC 684
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.