JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the private respondents.

2. All the above-noted writ petitions involve common questions for consideration raised by the petitioner praying for rejection of the claim of the claimants on the ground their non-furnishing of the computerized khatauni being as required under Clause 4 of the agreement and about imposition of penalty upon the petitioner under Clause 22(b) of the agreement. Hence, all the above said petitions have been heard in a bunch and they are being disposed of by means of this common judgment to be applicable to all the writ petitions. The petitioner-Oriental Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as 'Petitioner Insurance Company') has preferred these writ petitions against the orders passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, Lucknow allowing the insurance claim of the claimants and imposing penalty upon the petitioner under Clause 22(b) of the agreement.

(i) The writ petition i.e. Writ C No. 1000840 of 2015 has been preferred for quashing of the impugned judgment and order dated 29.09.2014 passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, Lucknow in P.L.A. Case No. 52 of 2014 (Abhishek Kumar and another Vs.