SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH
Modi Distillery – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Rajat Bose along with Sri Pratik J. Nagar & Sri Atulya Kishore, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General along with Sri A.K. Goyal, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Sri Jagdish Mishra, learned Standing Counsel, for the State respondents.
2. Present petition has been filed against the orders dated 08.07.2019 and 25.01.2021. By order dated 08.07.2019, passed by respondent no.3/Deputy Commissioner, Excise, Meerut Region, Meerut, Consideration Fee/ ‘Pratiphal Shulk’ Rs. 15,51,042.50 has been imposed on the petitioner, on alleged excess loss of High Strength Malt Spirit (hereinafter referred to as the HSMS), against two transactions. That order has been confirmed in appeal, vide order dated 27.01.2021, passed by the Excise Commissioner.
3. Admittedly, the petitioner has a remedy of revision against the order dated 27.01.2021, under Section 11 of the Uttar Pradesh Excise Act, 1910 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). However, the present petition was filed directly before this Court, on the plea of
Garden Silk Mills Ltd. & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.
Kiran Spinning Mills vs. Collector of Customs
Mohan Meakin Breweries Ltd. Vs Excise & Taxation Commr., Chandigarh & Ors.
State of U.P. & Ors Vs. Modi Distillery & Ors.
ICD Dadri. Referring to Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.
State of U.P. and Others Vs. Delhi Cloth Mills and another
State of Jharkhand and Others Vs. Ajanta Bottlers and Blenders Pvt. Ltd
Deccan Sugar & Abkari Co. Ltd. v. Commr. of Excise
Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P.
Har Shankar v. Excise & Taxation Commr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.