KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR
Santram – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Raj Kumar Sharma, learned amicus curiae for the appellant and Shri S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present jail appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 27.02.2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut in Session Trial No. 277/2017, crime No. 390/2016, under Sections 452/307/504/506 I.P.C., P.S. Hastinapur, District Meerut whereby the appellant has been convicted under Sections 307 I.P.C. to undergo seven years simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs.2000/-, under Section 452 I.P.C. to undergo two years of simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1000/-, under Section 504 I.P.C. to undergo two years of simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1000/- and under Section 506 I.P.C. to undergo two years of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1000/-, with default provisions.
3. The prosecution case as per the written report is that the brother-in-law of Raju son of the informant Kanwar Pal came since few days to do the agricultural work. Santram (accused-appellant) who is from the village of the informant and is a scoundrel person by threatening to Raju, he used to take money for drinking liquor. Today on 21.10.2016 in the evening
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.