RAMESH SINHA, RENU AGARWAL
Mumtazim – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Renu Agarwal, J.
1. This appeal under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C has been preferred by the convicted appellants Muntazim, Mustaqim, Rhimuddin and Idris against the judgment and order dated 19.09.1984 passed by Shri H.L. Kurel III-Additional Sessions Judge, Barabanki in Sessions Trial No. 241 of 1982 convicting and sentencing the appellants under Section 147 IPC to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment, and to further undergo 1½ years rigorous imprisonment under Section 148 IPC and to undergo life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC read with section 149 IPC.
2. Wrapping the facts in brief the deceased Haji Majid Ashraf Khan owned a house in Village Sipahiya, Police Station Mawai District Barabanki. He had raised his house on his own land adjoining to his house. The accused Idris claimed that adjoining land. There was unfriendly atmosphere between the two families A case was registered against the accused but he was acquitted of that offence. On account of this enmity, accused Idris had beaten Haji Ashraf Khan at Madhwa Nala.
3. Parnala of complainant’s house falls in Kolia between the house of the complainant and the accused Muntazim. The accused person had taken out parnala, ra
Amit v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Dalip Singh v. State of Punjab 1954 SCR 145
Gangabhavani v. Rayapati Venkat Reddy
Ganapathi v. State of Tamil Nadu
Gulam Sabar Vs. State of Bihar reported at (2014) 3 SCC 401
Jayabalan v. Union Territory of Pondicherry
Kartik Malhar Vs. State of Bihar (1996) 1 SCC 614
Mohd. Rojali Versus State of Assam: (2019) 19 SCC 567
Rameshwar v. The State of Rajasthan [1952] SCR 377= AIR 1952 SC 54
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.