AJIT KUMAR
Malati Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Yadav – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri K.K.Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Prakhar Tandon, learned counsel for the contesting respondents.
2. Both the matters arise out of same suit, therefore, are being heard and decided together by this common judgment.
3. The petitioner before this Court is tenant respondent in Small Causes Suit No. 193 of 2012, which came to be decreed dated 24.7.2019 for arrears of rent and ejectment.
4. The petitioner challenged the order of the Judge Small Causes before the Additional District Judge, Court No. 2 by instituting Small Causes Revision being No. 60 of 2019 which also came to be dismissed vide order dated 31st January, 2020 confirming the judgment of the Judge, Small Causes and hence this miscellaneous petition under Article 227 of the Constitution.
5. Present petitioner has also filed revision against the order passed by the Judge, Small Causes rejecting the application of the petitioner under Section 23 of Small Causes Courts Act, 1887.
6. The main arguments that were advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner can be summarized as under:
Budhu Mal v Mahabir Prasad and Others
Mukesh Singh and another vs. Ramesh Chand Solanki 2011 (89) AllLR 655
Maya Devi and Another v. Vipin Kumar Kushwaha and Another
Suresh and Another v. Ram Bharosey Lal Gupta and Others 2014 0 Supreme (All) 1579 (2014 11 ADJ 327)
Pradyuman Jee vs. Special/Additional District Judge
Sheel Chand v. Iind A.D.J.,Jhansi
Yusuful Haq @ Yusuf and others vs. Smt. Ghayyur Fatma and others 2012 (92) AllLR 526
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.