IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Surendra Singh-I, J.
Ram Sarokh and Others – Appellants
Versus
State – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 3122 of 1985
Decided On : 25-11-2022
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 147,148,149, 307, 323 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 313, 357 – Criminal Appeal – Armed with deadly weapon – Punishment for rioting – Attempt to murder – Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt – Power to examine accused – Claiming compensation – Order to pay compensation – Criminal appeal – During pendency of appeal, appellant-accused, Ram and have died and Criminal Appeal qua them has been abated vide order criminal appeal against accused-appellants, is pending for disposal –Held, Considering facts and circumstances of case and law propounded by Supreme Court regarding sentence of accused as well as providing compensation to victim, interest of justice will be better served if fine is imposed on accused-appellants and injured victims are compensated from the portion of fine – Appeal is partly allowed and the sentence is modified – Appellants-accused are imposed fine of each, under Section 147 IPC each under Section 323 IPC – Out of fine received from appellants-accused each shall be paid to injured – Accused-appellants shall deposit fine within two months from date of this judgement – In case they do not deposit fine within prescribed time, they shall have to undergo period of sentence/imprisonment passed by Trial Court against them – Appeal is partly allowed.
JUDGMENT :
1. This criminal appeal has been instituted against the judgement and order dated 05.11.1985 passed by the Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Azamgarh in Sessions Trial No. 35 of 1984, State vs. Jheenak and others. By the impugned judgement aforesaid, the Trial Court had convicted appellants Ram Sarikh s/o Dashrath, Ram Lachhan s/o Dashrath, Dhaneshwar s/o Navrang and Shiv Chand s/o Sanehi under Sections 147, 323 read with Section 149 I.P.C. and sentenced each accused-appellants to one year’s rigorous imprisonment under Section 147 I.P.C., six month’s rigorous imprisonment under Section 323 read with Section 149 I.P.C. Both sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. During pendency of appeal, appellant-accused, Ram Lachhan and Dhaneshwar have died and Criminal Appeal qua them has been abated vide order dated 23.09.2022. Thus, criminal appeal against accused-appellants, Ram Sarikh and Shiv Chand is pending for disposal.
3. The prosecution case, as revealed in written report dated 05.04.1980 at 10 am submitted to the Police Station Madhuban is that that informant Triveni s/o Cheekhur is resident of Daryabad, Police Station Madhuban, District Azamgarh. On 05.04.1980, when his son Chandra Pati was returning to his home from his shop, he saw that Jheenak s/o Dhaneshwar r/o Parvejpur was cutting Lathifrom his bamboos trees (Banskoth). Informant’s son forbid him from cutting Lathi. Being enraged on this, accused Jheenak started abusing the informant’s son. Hearing the noise, accused Ram Sarikh and Ram Lachhan s/o Dashrath, Dhaneshwar s/o Navrang, Shiv Chand s/o Sanehi and 12 other accused, in pursuance of common intention exhorting others, assaulted informant’s son Chandra Pati with Dandaand Bhala.
4. Hearing the crying of his son, informant Triveni reached at the place of occurrence and started defending his son. Ram Sheesh Lal fired by a country made pistol on him and his son causing injuries to them. On the basis of written report (Exhibit Ka-1) Case Crime No. 79 of 1980 under Sections 147,148,149 and 307 I.P.C. was registered against the accused-appellants. Exhibit Ka-4 is the Chik FIR. Entry of the criminal case was made in the GD as report no. 26 time 3:20 dated 05.04.1980 by the Head Moharrir present in the police station. The certified copies of the written report is Exhibit Ka-5.
5. Medical Officer, Dr. Digvijay Singh examined the informant injured Triveni on 05.04.1980 at 9:30 p.m. at PHC Fatehpur Mandav. During examination the following injuries were found on the person of injured Triveni :
2. Lacerated wound 0.5 cm X 0.2 cm X 0.2 cm on right palm, 4 cm below the right wrist joint.
In the opinion of the doctor injuries were simple in nature, caused by blunt object. Duration about one day old.
6. Kavalpati s/o Triveni was examined by Dr. Digvijay Singh on 05.04.1980 at 9:50 pm and following injuries were found:
2. Lacerated wound 0.8 cum X 0.2 cm right little finger on outer side near the nail bed.
3. Contusion 3 cm X 1.5 cm on left palm, inner side touching the left wrist joint. Red in color.
4. Contusion 5 cm X 1 cm on back of left knee joint outer side. Red in color.
According to the opinion of the doctor, all injuries were simple in nature, caused by a blunt object. Except injury no. 1, all injuries were about one day old. Duration of injury no. 1 could not be assessed.
7. On the basis of the injury report, the criminal case was converted into under Section 147/323 I.P.C. G.D. entry thereof is Exhibit Ka-6.
8. The investigation of the case was done by Investigation Officer, S.I. Vishnukant Singh (PW-6), who visited the place of occurrence and prepared the site plan. After investigation he submitted final report. In the case, on the direction of the C.O. concerned, the Investigatin
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the nature of the injury and the circumstances of the case in altering the conviction under Section 307 I.P.C. to Section 324/....
Point of Law : If the sentence awarded is reduced to the period already undergone and a reasonable compensation is awarded to the victim, the ends of justice would be served.
The court highlighted that the presence of multiple eyewitnesses and the nature of the injuries inflicted are critical in determining the intent behind the actions of the accused, which can lead to a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.