SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 1289

Kiran – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Abhay Raj Singh, Vikas Rana, Vishal Mohan Gupta

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant criminal appeal has been filed with the prayer to set aside/quash the impugned judgment and order dated 5.4.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.3, Shahjahanpur in Sessions Trial No.338 of 2014 (State v. Anil & Anr.) (arising out of Crime No.175 of 2014, under Sections 304, 452, 506, 120-B IPC, Police Station-Sadar Bazar, District-Shahjahanpur and to acquit the appellants.

3. Brief facts as culled out from the record are that the informant-Kandhai submitted a written report to the Superintendent of Police-Shahjahanpur, on the basis of which, F.I.R. was registered at Police Station-Sadar Bazar, District-Shahjahanpur. It is stated in the aforesaid report that daughter of the informant namely Rajbeti used to reside in a separate house with her husband. On 25.11.2013 at about 10:00 p.m., Govind, Suraj and Anil all real brothers entered the house of her daughter and set her ablaze by pouring kerosene oil. It is also stated in the repor

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top