J. J. MUNIR
Ram Karan – Appellant
Versus
Uma Shanker – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This is a plaintiffs’ appeal, who had a vacillating fortune before the Courts below in a suit instituted for the relief of permanent prohibitory injunction.
2. Original Suit No. 455 of 1984 was instituted by Ram Karan son of Ishwar Dutt Tripathi and Dadhich Chand son of Ram Karan against Uma Shanker and Paras Nath on 08.08.1984, claiming a permanent prohibitory injunction to the effect that the defendants be restrained from interfering with the plaintiffs’ possession in part of their abadi and Sahan (Courtyard), denoted by letters C D E M in the plaint map or disturbing the Neem tree standing there.
3. The two plaintiffs were the original appellants here. Of them, Ram Karan died pending appeal and is represented on record by his heirs and LRs, who are appellant nos. 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, 1/6 and 1/7. Appellant no. 1/3 is on record as appellant no.2. All the appellants shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as ‘the plaintiffs’. However, in case of individual reference, the concerned plaintiff shall be referred to by his name. The two defendants to the suit, Uma Shanker and Paras Nath were in the same order arrayed as respondent nos. 1 and 2 to this appeal. Both
B.V. Nagesh v. H.V. Sreenivasa Murthy
Bachhaj Nahar v. Nilima Mandal and another
Deb Narayan Halder v. Anushree Halder (Smt)
Hari Lal v. Amrik Singh and another
Malluru Mallappa (Dead) through Legal Representatives v. Kuruvathappa and others
Rangayyan v. Innasimuthu Mudali
Santosh Hazari v. Purushottam Tiwari (Deceased) by LRs
Sarju Pershad Ramdeo Sahu v. Jwaleshwari Pratap Narain Singh
Shankar Ramchandra Abhyankar v. Krishnaji Dattatreya Bapat
Shasidhar v. Ashwini Uma Mathad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.